Quote:
Originally Posted by wiley
TCC and WHH are not mutually exclusive.
If I had eggs for breakfast yesterday and then I go back and have cereal instead, history shows I had cereal (WHH). The egg breakfast was erased and never happened. WHH is NOT WHAH.
|
Well I'm not following you at all then. You just described Back to the Future to the T with your breakfast example !!
When they went back to the past and Marty McFly changed the past...it became the NEW past...just as you describe the change in breakfast. (Your WHH). The only difference is that it wasn't cereal...it was basically his father showing a more dominant role that he did not initial play as his first past. The consequence of that was the future was changed... There were not "two" pasts in Back to the Future...there was only one. The original past never happened any more....and was erased. It was "course corrected"...if you prefer those words.
They have said it and I also feel fairly confident in saying that Cuse et all will not show us this sort of Back to the Future scenario. I believe they are way past this.
I think LT quickly spotted the major gapping hole with this description of WHH but then backed down. The description I see on all the forums for the die hard WHH's never has TWO pasts. Namely, the past "is being made" intially, for the first and the ONLY time....it is not being "changed" or "corrected" at all. It is the
ONLY past, the ALWAYS PAST and that WHH is the same as WHAH. The "A" is just silent.
If it is not, then you surely have "back to the future" style time travel, ala "course correction", new past, future changes, and most die hard WHH's know this is a dead end.
I do agree they are not "mutually excusive"...I believe they are continuous with WHH simple a special case of TCC where probability is 100%.